Braden
doesn't have many friends. I'm not sure if he has any because he
never talks of any, never gets together with any, never receives
calls from or makes calls to any, and says he eats lunch alone at
school. And he's lived this way since about middle school. It's
been a long-running concern for us, so we've provided opportunities
for him—grand opportunities—to make friends through church,
scouting, and of course public school classes and activities. It's
sort of a lead-the-horse-to-water thing: we can provide him
opportunities but it's up to him what he does with them.
Deanne
and I aren't social butterflies, as our social lives are already full
with work, family, and church activities. So our kids don't have the
best examples of adult-to-adult friendship socializing, though we do
have friends over on rare occasion.
Regardless
of how much I stress the importance of having friends is, I suspect
that Braden somewhere along the line decided that friends aren't
worth it and has contented himself to limiting his social life to
just us. He even fell away from scouting for awhile. Meanwhile
church activities are limited to adult-led and organized activities:
no real friend or friends to just hang out with and talk to about
whatever.
This
is a huge change from when I grew up and neighborhood friends were
almost always around and available to hang out and play with (mostly
sports, but also to do kid activities like catch crayfish, shoot bb
gun, explore the woods, climb trees, bike ride, etc.) from after
school (I'd rush through my homework) until sundown and dinner time,
making for some happy childhood memories.
It's
not as if Braden's unfriendable due to “lack of social skills”—I
always hated that description because it's applied so inaptly all too
often, in that skillfulness (whatever that means) does not lead to
friendships, mutual caring, concern, time, and companionship do,
skills be damned. And some of the least socially skilled persons
around (those overly shy or who struggle with speech impediments,
say, or those who miss social cues) sometimes develop the closest
bonds imaginable. And Braden has none of those challenges, he speaks
in turn, exercises manners within the normal range, and acts pretty
much like others his age. He strikes me, then, as one who has been
burned once too often, and thus doesn't think it's worthwhile to
pursue friendships, because he's happy enough without, perhaps
counting family as his closest and only friends (which isn't so awful
when you think about it).
But
he's been spending way too much time in his room reading and
listening to radio and resenting going out for exercise (doing not
much real exercise when he goes out anyway), which builds up
resentments against us when he doesn't get his way because he doesn't
have a friend to vent and share his frustrations with.
So
I insisted that he check out Christian Club at school. It took a few
tries but he finally did, and dropped in during lunch recesses at
group gatherings. Unfortunately, it's been lecture-based, so he
hasn't formed any friends yet, but at least that beats being
alone all the time.
Then
I insisted he do something else like check out the scout troop that
meets at our church (versus the one that he was at that met at his
former elementary school). He went to a couple of get-togethers and
liked them well enough to want to join. Here's where the stronghold
comes in. He still hasn't earned a single merit badge, this after
over four years as a scout. By comparison, after four years I had
earned over a dozen merit badges—they're fun, educational, and
challenging—a big part of character and leadership development,
health, fitness, and skillfulness. I've been encouraging him for
years to pursue them but he's always showed indifference. I've let
him go. No longer. I insisted that if he wants to switch to this
new troop, that he now take scouting serious and earn his first
badge.
We
have over twenty merit badge pamphlets out in the garage from which
to choose (a hand-me-down gift from my cousin's son). Braden made
lame excuses one after another why he couldn't. I knew something was
wrong at that point—a spiritual stronghold or mental block not of
God.
I
offered to pray for him to get past this, insisting that he could do
it, or if he feared initiating social contact (with the Scout Master
to earn the merit badge), that he could overcome it, that I knew he
could do anything, that God knew he could do anything, and that it
was only he that didn't believe he could.
I
said are we in agreement?
He
said I don't have a choice.
I
said that's right. Just like the $60 model boat you begged us to buy
using Grandma's gift money that you didn't built for over a year that
I had to force you to build. You built it. And you are going to
earn a merit badge. Any one. Your choice.
It
took way more push than I would have preferred, but he finally did
it—got going on reading the pamphlet and doing the research,
performing a phone interview, and is ready to attend a public meeting
and volunteer for community service and meet with his new Scout
Master.
A
Christian counselor once said that the teen years are ones of
striving between child fighting for independence and parent
struggling to maintain control over the child's development and
safety and that this push/pull conflict cannot be avoided, which
makes those years so challenging. Praise God Braden finally came
to—it's for his own good, like it or not. He's better for having
built and finished the boat. He'll be better off for having earned
his first merit badge, too. God willing.
Aloha and mahalo for visiting! We pray God's blessings on all via this website, read or unread. Laugh, sigh in recognition, perhaps shed a few tears, and nod in agreement as the fullness of family matters in Hawaii comes to life in thought and feel if not in physical presence, and truths, tangible and relevant, are revealed. We love you all; God bless you!
Monday, February 29, 2016
Friday, February 19, 2016
Canceled Trip—Praise God!
Last
month I was pleased to find low airfares to Japan and planned a
possible family vacation in Osaka—if I could find reasonable
accommodations. All the hotels and hostels I called or tried to
reserve on-line, though, were either fully booked or allowed
reservations at most three months (or even one month) prior to
check-in.
In
the interim, I planned a tentative itinerary that included the Osaka
Aquarium, Kids Plaza Osaka, Aizen (Cultural) Festival Hoe Palanquin
Parade, Nara Deer Park, Minoo Park, Floating Garden (sunset view from
top of building), Kuromon Ichiban (food bazaar), plus perhaps visits
to a castle and a temple. It was going to be a full trip on a
reasonable budget with lots of walking around, some catching of rail
and limousine bus, food and grocery shopping for in-room cooking, and
perhaps meeting up with distant relatives (my dad's cousin's kids and
their children). It would certainly have been a memorable trip, if a
bit stressful and expensive.
But
with the delays in securing accommodations, airfares rose as I had
anticipated and feared they might. But there was no way I would have
booked flights earlier at the low fares without a reserved room and
risk a nightmare scenario where we'd later have to book any room (or
rooms) we could get at any price (which could easily rise to
$500+/night—youch!) Available airfares had risen from a reasonable $640/person
round-trip to over a $1000/person—too much for our limited budget
and not worth it for a short one-week stay (and we still don't have
accommodations).
Funny
thing though, I'm not very disappointed, I'm more so relieved.
No more stress of planning train rides, walking tours, meals,
itineraries, and figuring out how to keep everyone happy. No more
fear of the unknown: getting lost, getting ill, losing things,
having bad experiences (it happens on all trips, it seems), having
flight or hotel difficulties, jet lag, trouble sleeping, or digestion
problems, etc. Are such complicated trips really worth all the
expense and stress, I sometimes wonder? (They have been worth it in
the past, but that's no guarantee of future success.)
Over
a decade ago, I had a preliminary notion of taking our family of four
on a mission trip to Africa. I imagined our kids (ages five and two
at the time) wrapping some of their simple toys (large Lego pieces, a
stuffed animal, etc.—whatever they wanted) to share with orphans
they'd meet. It turned out our kids were too young for the “working
trip” so it got canceled. Nonetheless, I shared with my friend
Norm that it was as if I really had taken the trip (the visions I had
had of the kids giving away their presents wrapped in their home-made
wrapping paper were so vivid!) He mocked me for it. My relief for
having been spared the half-way-'round-the-world plane rides with
multiple stop-overs and connections, twelve hours of jet lag, sparse
accommodations, and risks of malaria and who knew what else? made me
feel even more content—the sense that I had experienced much of the
benefits of the trip without the costs.
An
article I recently read vindicated my feelings. It said that those
who planned vacation trips and didn't end up taking them were happier
than those that took theirs and those that didn't plan a trip at all.
I
shared with Pene a couple weeks back about this research finding and
wondered would it work to plan a trip knowing you weren't going to
go? Would you still be happier for it than those in the other two
groups? (I doubted it, because the relief wouldn't be real.)
But
I did say that other studies showed that imagined vacations
throughout one's workday, say, can help reduce stress as if you
really did go. Imagine sipping sodas before a sunset on a beach in
the Bahamas. Ahhh. Such daydreams in times of stress can be good
and healthy.
Although
I'm relieved in a way that the trip didn't work out, that doesn't
mean I've given up hope of a summer trip somewhere. Last I checked,
airfares to Narita (just north of Tokyo) were quite reasonable.
Perhaps a chance for us to revisit Japan Disneyland with our
relatives? It all depends on the accommodations. Back to square
one...
Tuesday, February 9, 2016
Candy Store Keys
Without
our realizing it, Jaren has likely been for years abusing his keys to
the candy store of the D.O.E's creation.
The state Department of Education (D.O.E.) in response to federal mandates, I guess, has for years required all parents to deposit monies into a child's lunch money on-line account, which parents do not have access to to monitor proper deposits or expenditures by their child or to insure no thefts have occurred. Parents must therefore request receipts for deposits and calculate the account's depletion rate over time by multiplying school days between replenishments of funds by cost per lunch.
According to Deanne's and Braden's calculations, the balances have been proper for Braden and Pene who have to deposit cash—no checks allowed. Since Jared's school accepts checks, we never bothered to recalculate for accuracy.
Big mistake. Last Friday, Pene approached Deanne and said, “When I picked up Jaren at school, a lady I never saw before approached me and said, 'Hi, I'm the school lunch monitor; I know your mom. Does she know Jaren's been eating second breakfasts and that's why his lunch monies keep running out so fast?'”
We asked Jaren about it and he admitted he “took a few breakfasts and once or twice took second breakfasts and that was all.”
Deanne attempted to compute the approximate misuse of funds and came up with several dollars worth missing, but without remembering actual balances reported to her (via a note in Jaren's binder when his account runs low), I knew it was largely guesswork. Nonetheless, I made Jaren pay us sixteen dollars plus gave him time-out all weekend and told Deanne to request the school to print-out all expenditures from Jaren's account by day and amount over the past year.
On Monday, she got the list I requested that showed over fifty dollars of expenditures on breakfasts dated from when Deanne started working full-time late last year and second breakfasts, juice, and milk (most certainly chocolate—he has a sweet tooth) dated back to the beginning of the year, all of which he knew he was not supposed to purchase, which he kept secret, then lied about after we asked. I told Deanne this has probably been going on for years.
So I had Jaren empty his wallet, which came out to approximately fifty dollars, plus gave him time-out the remainder of the month, plus took away some toys when he immediately disobeyed my order not to play.
I then told Deanne to request the school to allow Jaren to purchase only lunches and nothing else.
The school in response said that the system won't allow blanket blocks (comparable to parental computer controls over PC's) but they'll notify the lunch monitor to restrict Jaren's purchases according to our wishes. She also said we weren't the first to request this.
What's disturbing about the D.O.E.'s role in this was that it was all avoidable and it took a nice, caring, conscientious lunch monitor to notify our daughter of Jaren's ongoing thievery. We should also have been notified immediately when it occurred years ago and initially been given the option to restrict purchases to lunches only, I believe.
Not to get alarmist, but white-collar criminals start exactly this way. Steal a little once. See what happens. Nothing? Try again, this time a little more. Still okay? Get greedier and greedier and greedier. I'll never get caught, the perpetrator thinks.
It's like tempting kids then teaching them the wrong ethical lesson when they succumb to temptation: steal from then lie to your parents.
This anything-goes lunch-money account use by kids also can't be helping our nation's explosive obesity epidemic. If you're bored, eat! Why play outdoors, eat instead! it seems to suggest. And it's sad to think how many kids never get caught and carry out such thievery beyond elementary, middle, and high schools to clubs, workplace, or anywhere else they have easy, unaccountable access to money.
The state Department of Education (D.O.E.) in response to federal mandates, I guess, has for years required all parents to deposit monies into a child's lunch money on-line account, which parents do not have access to to monitor proper deposits or expenditures by their child or to insure no thefts have occurred. Parents must therefore request receipts for deposits and calculate the account's depletion rate over time by multiplying school days between replenishments of funds by cost per lunch.
According to Deanne's and Braden's calculations, the balances have been proper for Braden and Pene who have to deposit cash—no checks allowed. Since Jared's school accepts checks, we never bothered to recalculate for accuracy.
Big mistake. Last Friday, Pene approached Deanne and said, “When I picked up Jaren at school, a lady I never saw before approached me and said, 'Hi, I'm the school lunch monitor; I know your mom. Does she know Jaren's been eating second breakfasts and that's why his lunch monies keep running out so fast?'”
We asked Jaren about it and he admitted he “took a few breakfasts and once or twice took second breakfasts and that was all.”
Deanne attempted to compute the approximate misuse of funds and came up with several dollars worth missing, but without remembering actual balances reported to her (via a note in Jaren's binder when his account runs low), I knew it was largely guesswork. Nonetheless, I made Jaren pay us sixteen dollars plus gave him time-out all weekend and told Deanne to request the school to print-out all expenditures from Jaren's account by day and amount over the past year.
On Monday, she got the list I requested that showed over fifty dollars of expenditures on breakfasts dated from when Deanne started working full-time late last year and second breakfasts, juice, and milk (most certainly chocolate—he has a sweet tooth) dated back to the beginning of the year, all of which he knew he was not supposed to purchase, which he kept secret, then lied about after we asked. I told Deanne this has probably been going on for years.
So I had Jaren empty his wallet, which came out to approximately fifty dollars, plus gave him time-out the remainder of the month, plus took away some toys when he immediately disobeyed my order not to play.
I then told Deanne to request the school to allow Jaren to purchase only lunches and nothing else.
The school in response said that the system won't allow blanket blocks (comparable to parental computer controls over PC's) but they'll notify the lunch monitor to restrict Jaren's purchases according to our wishes. She also said we weren't the first to request this.
What's disturbing about the D.O.E.'s role in this was that it was all avoidable and it took a nice, caring, conscientious lunch monitor to notify our daughter of Jaren's ongoing thievery. We should also have been notified immediately when it occurred years ago and initially been given the option to restrict purchases to lunches only, I believe.
Not to get alarmist, but white-collar criminals start exactly this way. Steal a little once. See what happens. Nothing? Try again, this time a little more. Still okay? Get greedier and greedier and greedier. I'll never get caught, the perpetrator thinks.
It's like tempting kids then teaching them the wrong ethical lesson when they succumb to temptation: steal from then lie to your parents.
This anything-goes lunch-money account use by kids also can't be helping our nation's explosive obesity epidemic. If you're bored, eat! Why play outdoors, eat instead! it seems to suggest. And it's sad to think how many kids never get caught and carry out such thievery beyond elementary, middle, and high schools to clubs, workplace, or anywhere else they have easy, unaccountable access to money.
Monday, February 1, 2016
Auntie Julie's Silent Suffering
Please
read my relevant letter published at the following link: http://www.metrohnl.com/dear-auntie-julie/. It's a
letter to my Auntie Julie that mentions our missing her at her eldest
sister's (my Auntie Bea's) funeral and my well wishes for her speedy
recovery from a hip injury and other ailments.
My main purpose for writing was the same as my final visit to Maui Grandpa (my Dad's dad) just before he succumbed to stomach cancer: to say Thank you and Goodbye. I'm not certain about Auntie Julie's health—just what I've been told—but she's obviously and justifiably been suffering since the recent death of her beloved husband (my Uncle Tani). Not accepting visitors or phone calls (or letters, I assume) from anyone and not attending her sister's funeral (all the Aunties are close) were highly unexpected for such a social, lively lady and because she was utterly charming, warm, and gracious as usual at Uncle Tani's funeral. When I later learned of her “I just want to join him” comment and her weight loss (she was already slight of build), it concerned me even more so that I eventually felt compelled to do something...just in case.
So after my letter's publication (some stuff got edited out), I sent a copy of the published and original versions to her eldest son and wife (and kids) for them to decide whether or not to share either or both with her. I suspect they will offer them but that she'll decline. Which is okay. At least I tried while still respecting her wishes. I also know in my heart that she knows my thoughts and feelings toward her, so full of love and appreciation.
It's been tough seeing elders from “The Greatest Generation” go. That's an apt description as they really were and are great, such that I doubt we'll measure up (ours will probably be referred to as The Good Enough or Okay or So-so Generation by comparison). And I really don't want to see her go. And I'd love to see and visit her, preferably with my family, but alone if necessary, to try to comfort her and make her smile and feel glad to be alive and to hear her voice and stories or whatever she desires. I miss such talking and socializing with her and my other elders, we so rarely get together these days except for sad occasions.
I've found this to be one of the most difficult trials of aging—seeing my elders suffer, deteriorate, and go. It's true what they say about honoring and enjoying them while they are still hale and present. Though most were in their eighties when they went, it still seemed far too soon.
My main purpose for writing was the same as my final visit to Maui Grandpa (my Dad's dad) just before he succumbed to stomach cancer: to say Thank you and Goodbye. I'm not certain about Auntie Julie's health—just what I've been told—but she's obviously and justifiably been suffering since the recent death of her beloved husband (my Uncle Tani). Not accepting visitors or phone calls (or letters, I assume) from anyone and not attending her sister's funeral (all the Aunties are close) were highly unexpected for such a social, lively lady and because she was utterly charming, warm, and gracious as usual at Uncle Tani's funeral. When I later learned of her “I just want to join him” comment and her weight loss (she was already slight of build), it concerned me even more so that I eventually felt compelled to do something...just in case.
So after my letter's publication (some stuff got edited out), I sent a copy of the published and original versions to her eldest son and wife (and kids) for them to decide whether or not to share either or both with her. I suspect they will offer them but that she'll decline. Which is okay. At least I tried while still respecting her wishes. I also know in my heart that she knows my thoughts and feelings toward her, so full of love and appreciation.
It's been tough seeing elders from “The Greatest Generation” go. That's an apt description as they really were and are great, such that I doubt we'll measure up (ours will probably be referred to as The Good Enough or Okay or So-so Generation by comparison). And I really don't want to see her go. And I'd love to see and visit her, preferably with my family, but alone if necessary, to try to comfort her and make her smile and feel glad to be alive and to hear her voice and stories or whatever she desires. I miss such talking and socializing with her and my other elders, we so rarely get together these days except for sad occasions.
I've found this to be one of the most difficult trials of aging—seeing my elders suffer, deteriorate, and go. It's true what they say about honoring and enjoying them while they are still hale and present. Though most were in their eighties when they went, it still seemed far too soon.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)