Without
our realizing it, Jaren has likely been for years abusing his keys to
the candy store of the D.O.E's creation.
The
state Department of Education (D.O.E.) in response to federal
mandates, I guess, has for years required all parents to deposit
monies into a child's lunch money on-line account, which parents do
not have access to to monitor proper deposits or expenditures by
their child or to insure no thefts have occurred. Parents must
therefore request receipts for deposits and calculate the account's
depletion rate over time by multiplying school days between
replenishments of funds by cost per lunch.
According
to Deanne's and Braden's calculations, the balances have been proper
for Braden and Pene who have to deposit cash—no checks allowed.
Since Jared's school accepts checks, we never bothered to recalculate
for accuracy.
Big
mistake. Last Friday, Pene approached Deanne and said, “When I
picked up Jaren at school, a lady I never saw before approached me
and said, 'Hi, I'm the school lunch monitor; I know your mom. Does
she know Jaren's been eating second breakfasts and that's why his
lunch monies keep running out so fast?'”
We
asked Jaren about it and he admitted he “took a few breakfasts and
once or twice took second breakfasts and that was all.”
Deanne
attempted to compute the approximate misuse of funds and came up with
several dollars worth missing, but without remembering actual
balances reported to her (via a note in Jaren's binder when his
account runs low), I knew it was largely guesswork. Nonetheless, I
made Jaren pay us sixteen dollars plus gave him time-out all weekend
and told Deanne to request the school to print-out all expenditures
from Jaren's account by day and amount over the past year.
On
Monday, she got the list I requested that showed over fifty dollars
of expenditures on breakfasts dated from when Deanne started working
full-time late last year and second breakfasts, juice, and milk (most
certainly chocolate—he has a sweet tooth) dated back to the
beginning of the year, all of which he knew he was not supposed to
purchase, which he kept secret, then lied about after we asked. I
told Deanne this has probably been going on for years.
So
I had Jaren empty his wallet, which came out to approximately fifty
dollars, plus gave him time-out the remainder of the month, plus took
away some toys when he immediately disobeyed my order not to play.
I
then told Deanne to request the school to allow Jaren to purchase
only lunches and nothing else.
The
school in response said that the system won't allow blanket blocks
(comparable to parental computer controls over PC's) but they'll
notify the lunch monitor to restrict Jaren's purchases according to
our wishes. She also said we weren't the first to request this.
What's
disturbing about the D.O.E.'s role in this was that it was all
avoidable and it took a nice, caring, conscientious lunch monitor to
notify our daughter of Jaren's ongoing thievery. We should
also have been notified immediately when it occurred years ago and
initially been given the option to restrict purchases to lunches
only, I believe.
Not
to get alarmist, but white-collar criminals start exactly this way.
Steal a little once. See what happens. Nothing? Try again, this
time a little more. Still okay? Get greedier and greedier and
greedier. I'll never get caught, the perpetrator thinks.
It's
like tempting kids then teaching them the wrong ethical lesson when
they succumb to temptation: steal from then lie to your
parents.
This
anything-goes lunch-money account use by kids also can't be helping
our nation's explosive obesity epidemic. If you're bored, eat!
Why play outdoors, eat instead! it seems to suggest. And it's
sad to think how many kids never get caught and carry out such
thievery beyond elementary, middle, and high schools to clubs,
workplace, or anywhere else they have easy, unaccountable access to money.
No comments:
Post a Comment