When
I was a kid, not many of my classmates looked great in our low-tech
middle school year book with card stock cover. Our awkward,
uncomfortable, and insecure personalities somehow showed even in the
low-definition photocopier-quality likenesses printed on plain paper
pages secured with staples down the center spine.
How
times have changed!
The
most salient feature in my daughter's expensive, glossy, hard-cover
year book overstuffed with too many pages of teeny-tiny color photos
galore are the number of photogenic kids with bright eyes and smiles,
and tons of confident show-case personalities—this despite their
being not especially handsome or pretty by objective standards, even
looking less mature than many of my peers looked at their ages,
probably in part because we got a lot more sun than kids these days
do.
I
marveled as I leafed through that there were dozens of great photos
that featured a cute smile, laughing eyes, a suggestive smirk, a
mysteriously averted gaze, or other flattering aspect. The camera
must love these kids, I thought.
Whereas
our yearbook from the 1970s contained perhaps only five or so “nice”
shots that featured a pasted-on smile, hair coiffed perfectly, an
attractive and complementary shirt or blouse. Technology aside, why
the huge change in the photographic subjects? I eventually realized
that back in my time, the ones who looked great were either the
outcasts or misfits or the overly self-absorbed who probably spent
way too much time in front of a mirror, primping and experimenting
with different poses and smiles. My mom made me do it one year in
elementary school before picture-taking because she'd gotten fed-up
with my awful likenesses from years past. After forty minutes of
back-and-forth between her coaching and bathroom mirror practice with
different smiles, I finally got one that satisfied her and she said,
“Perfect. Memorize that and use it tomorrow.” It was slightly
open-mouthed with raised brows, stretched back lips, upright posture,
and slightly raised chin. Mom was so super-pleased with the school
photo that year, I use the same basic smile to this day.
Too
many kids these days are armed with smart phones, so it stands to
reason that many such kids would get way too much practice taking
selfies, posting them on social media, and forwarding them to
friends. No wonder they're so photogenic, they're practicing all the
time with instant feedback technology. (Whereas back in my time,
film cameras took days, weeks, or months to see how things turned
out. Mirrors obviously gave instant feedback but weren't the same.
Smiling before a camera could be daunting as film was expensive and
you only had one shot, so it had to be good. The main thing was don't blink—even though you knew the flash was going to sting your
eyes and you'd see sparkles on hazy black for the next minute or two.
Today's super light-sensitive digital cameras by contrast require
hardly a flash at all. No wonder we had such wooden smiles.)
By
the way, our family does not possess a smart phone and my kids and I
aren't especially photogenic. They do alright, though, similar to
most of their peers and we're satisfied. I feel I take way better
photos of them than the school does and have never purchased school
formal photos. We have purchased group class photos on
occasion (mostly the younger years when they were soo cute.)
No comments:
Post a Comment